Difference between revisions of "Talk:Frequently asked questions"
(→Arch on ARM: re, closing)
|(12 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)|
|Line 1:||Line 1:|
... [[User :|]]:, December ()
I'- [] , 'the'-- [[User:|]] :, ()
Revision as of 21:49, 18 December 2013
Arch on ARM
Since the Arch ARM website links back to this wiki, I figured it would make sense to include support for ARM in the FAQ, do you agree? More specifically, I am referring to the section titled: Q) Why would I not want to use Arch? under the point: you require support for an architecture other than x86_64, i686 or ARM." Wingsuit (talk) 04:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- I saw your edit and it reminded me of a discussion we had some time ago. We have Samsung_Chromebook_(ARM) and Raspberry_Pi in our wiki, but both articles have a disclaimer, that ARM support is provided by Arch Linux ARM, not the original Arch Linux. There are other Arch-based distros that provide e.g. i586 support, but Arch Linux does not. -- Karol (talk) 04:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- This is the wiki for Arch Linux, Arch ARM is a different project, this must be clear in our documentation, ARM can't be mentioned just like a simple alternative supported architecture.
- Arch ARM is also already mentioned in Arch_Based_Distributions_(Active) and other articles, I think it's enough for people to get to know of its existence.
- -- Kynikos (talk) 10:57, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- I've just stepped forward and undone the edit - I don't have anything against Samsung_Chromebook_(ARM) or Raspberry_Pi as long as they have the disclaimer, but adding such note into article which is clearly describing the Arch is inappropriate for the reasons given in this discussion. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 21:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)