Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fish"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Isn't 'License' paragraph redundant? It's open source anyway and 99.9% users don't care to know which parts are GPL, BSD, etc.
 
Isn't 'License' paragraph redundant? It's open source anyway and 99.9% users don't care to know which parts are GPL, BSD, etc.
 +
 +
Check out pacman.fish in the github head.

Revision as of 19:59, 11 May 2013

Did anybody try to write fish completions for pacman? I like tthe fish completion system and I have written the complations for some other apps, but I am not able to obtain combined options (that is I am not able to tell fish to expect only the sync options after a "pacman -S"). Any tip, suggestion?

SanskritFritz: yes, I updated the pacman completions, it is now included into the main fish development head on github. I'll update the page to reflect latest happenings in fish development.

Isn't 'License' paragraph redundant? It's open source anyway and 99.9% users don't care to know which parts are GPL, BSD, etc.

Check out pacman.fish in the github head.