Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fish"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Current state: added response on history section)
(forgot signature)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
:I've renamed it to "History" and moved it to the top as I think it can still be useful. Let's see if somebody else agrees with the deletion though. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 03:00, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 
:I've renamed it to "History" and moved it to the top as I think it can still be useful. Let's see if somebody else agrees with the deletion though. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 03:00, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
  
::Your change makes it more reasonable for the article, but I still think it should be deleted. Most articles do not have a history section because (in my mind at least) they are out of this wiki's scope. For example, the bash and zsh wiki articles lack a history section because the wiki is meant to be instructional, not contain information which is arguably irrelevant to the programs current functionality. I hope that didn't come across as hostile, was a bit ranty :P
+
::Your change makes it more reasonable for the article, but I still think it should be deleted. Most articles do not have a history section because (in my mind at least) they are out of this wiki's scope. For example, the bash and zsh wiki articles lack a history section because the wiki is meant to be instructional, not contain information which is arguably irrelevant to the programs current functionality. I hope that didn't come across as hostile, was a bit ranty :P [[User:Pyroh|Pyroh]] ([[User talk:Pyroh|talk]]) 04:11, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:11, 29 June 2014

Current state

I was thinking that the "Current state of fish development" section at the bottom should be removed, any objections? Pyroh (talk) 01:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

I've renamed it to "History" and moved it to the top as I think it can still be useful. Let's see if somebody else agrees with the deletion though. -- Kynikos (talk) 03:00, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Your change makes it more reasonable for the article, but I still think it should be deleted. Most articles do not have a history section because (in my mind at least) they are out of this wiki's scope. For example, the bash and zsh wiki articles lack a history section because the wiki is meant to be instructional, not contain information which is arguably irrelevant to the programs current functionality. I hope that didn't come across as hostile, was a bit ranty :P Pyroh (talk) 04:11, 29 June 2014 (UTC)