Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fonts"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(No ttf-ms-fonts: Close.)
(sigh: Close log info.)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
The topic is probably a common search item for users. I think it could easily stand on its own, just for that reason, even before my additions.    --[[User:Thisoldman|Thisoldman]] 13:01, 22 November 2009 (EST)
 
The topic is probably a common search item for users. I think it could easily stand on its own, just for that reason, even before my additions.    --[[User:Thisoldman|Thisoldman]] 13:01, 22 November 2009 (EST)
  
== sigh ==
+
== <s> sigh </s> ==
  
 
There was a lot of misinformation inserted since my last edits. Instead of reverting months' worth of diddling about, I'll cross post directly from the fontconfig manual for reference. [[User:Self|self]] 13:49, 8 May 2010 (EDT)
 
There was a lot of misinformation inserted since my last edits. Instead of reverting months' worth of diddling about, I'll cross post directly from the fontconfig manual for reference. [[User:Self|self]] 13:49, 8 May 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 08:34, 7 September 2012

Split out Console fonts?

The topic is probably a common search item for users. I think it could easily stand on its own, just for that reason, even before my additions. --Thisoldman 13:01, 22 November 2009 (EST)

sigh

There was a lot of misinformation inserted since my last edits. Instead of reverting months' worth of diddling about, I'll cross post directly from the fontconfig manual for reference. self 13:49, 8 May 2010 (EDT)

No ttf-ms-fonts

in repos -- Dr.X 15:03, 11 September 2011 (EDT)

It's in the AUR, as are many of the other packages. thestinger 15:07, 11 September 2011 (EDT)