Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fonts"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (rm old)
m (missed a comment)
Line 1: Line 1:
Thanks for keeping the 'Beautifying fonts for LCD's in X' up to date. [[User:Misfit138|Misfit138]] 14:25, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
 
 
 
== Split out ''Console fonts?'' ==
 
== Split out ''Console fonts?'' ==
 
The topic is probably a common search item for users. I think it could easily stand on its own, just for that reason, even before my additions.    --[[User:Thisoldman|Thisoldman]] 13:01, 22 November 2009 (EST)
 
The topic is probably a common search item for users. I think it could easily stand on its own, just for that reason, even before my additions.    --[[User:Thisoldman|Thisoldman]] 13:01, 22 November 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 20:27, 5 February 2010

Split out Console fonts?

The topic is probably a common search item for users. I think it could easily stand on its own, just for that reason, even before my additions. --Thisoldman 13:01, 22 November 2009 (EST)

Simplify Font packages markup

Is there a reason for the horizontal rule beneath each heading in the Font packages section? This seems like a pointless stylistic addition; the headings alone provide enough separation, in my opinion.

-- pointone 13:55, 5 February 2010 (EST)

Well, yeah. I don't remember why I used them originally for Fonts#Font packages. Completely arbitrary, though. Dres 15:12, 5 February 2010 (EST)