Difference between revisions of "Talk:Frequently asked questions"

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 22: Line 22:
 
: [https://www.archlinux.org/news/required-update-to-pacman-501-before-2016-04-23/]
 
: [https://www.archlinux.org/news/required-update-to-pacman-501-before-2016-04-23/]
 
: [[User:Aimilius|Aimilius]] ([[User talk:Aimilius|talk]]) 16:01, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 
: [[User:Aimilius|Aimilius]] ([[User talk:Aimilius|talk]]) 16:01, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 +
 +
::Upgrading pacman and upgrading whole system (as if brand new) is completely different. Upgrading pacman didn't require much planning. But in this case it needs careful planning. 9 months is sufficient or not? I do not know (I havent been in this situation).
 +
 +
::I am '''not objecting''' the removal but I am just leaving this on talk page for discussion. I am ok with removal if there is noone objecting.
 +
 +
::-- [[User:Amish|Amish]] ([[User talk:Amish|talk]]) 16:38, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:38, 2 August 2018

Stable packages

add something like 'By default Arch uses stable packages as released by upstream.' to the end of Frequently_asked_questions#Is_Arch_Linux_a_stable_distribution.3F_Will_I_get_frequent_breakage.3F

Ubone (talk) 11:14, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Can I switch from i686 to x86_64 without reinstalling?

The section - "Can I switch from i686 to x86_64 without reinstalling?" was removed today.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Frequently_asked_questions&type=revision&diff=532225&oldid=529561

with a reason that Arch no more provides i686.

But I believe that, that's the exact reason, the section should be kept.

So that people who are still on 32bit Arch can migrate to 64bit without losing data.

-- Amish (talk) 15:51, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

While I get your point, Arch i686 had a 9 month depreciation period for people either change distros, upgrade to 64 bit Arch or start using a community port. The depreciation period ended in November 2017, and we are now another 9 more months further. We are talking about systems, which have not been maintained since November 2017 (any pacman -S command does not work on these systems since then). For comparison, when pacman got hook support, users were required to update within two months [1], before upgrades would be unsupported. I do not think we need to have that information on the FAQ anymore, this question should not be asked frequently :-).
[1]
Aimilius (talk) 16:01, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Upgrading pacman and upgrading whole system (as if brand new) is completely different. Upgrading pacman didn't require much planning. But in this case it needs careful planning. 9 months is sufficient or not? I do not know (I havent been in this situation).
I am not objecting the removal but I am just leaving this on talk page for discussion. I am ok with removal if there is noone objecting.
-- Amish (talk) 16:38, 2 August 2018 (UTC)