Talk:Frequently asked questions

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Stable packages

add something like 'By default Arch uses stable packages as released by upstream.' to the end of Frequently_asked_questions#Is_Arch_Linux_a_stable_distribution.3F_Will_I_get_frequent_breakage.3F

Ubone (talk) 11:14, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Can I switch from i686 to x86_64 without reinstalling?

The section - "Can I switch from i686 to x86_64 without reinstalling?" was removed today.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Frequently_asked_questions&type=revision&diff=532225&oldid=529561

with a reason that Arch no more provides i686.

But I believe that, that's the exact reason, the section should be kept.

So that people who are still on 32bit Arch can migrate to 64bit without losing data.

-- Amish (talk) 15:51, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

While I get your point, Arch i686 had a 9 month depreciation period for people either change distros, upgrade to 64 bit Arch or start using a community port. The depreciation period ended in November 2017, and we are now another 9 more months further. We are talking about systems, which have not been maintained since November 2017 (any pacman -S command does not work on these systems since then). For comparison, when pacman got hook support, users were required to update within two months [1], before upgrades would be unsupported. I do not think we need to have that information on the FAQ anymore, this question should not be asked frequently :-).
[1]
Aimilius (talk) 16:01, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Upgrading pacman and upgrading whole system (as if brand new) is completely different. Upgrading pacman didn't require much planning. But in this case it needs careful planning. 9 months is sufficient or not? I do not know (I havent been in this situation).
I am not objecting the removal but I am just leaving this on talk page for discussion. I am ok with removal if there is noone objecting.
-- Amish (talk) 16:38, 2 August 2018 (UTC)