Difference between revisions of "Talk:Full system backup with rsync"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Page title suggestion)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Suggestions ==
 +
 +
Page title does not use [[ArchWiki_Tutorial_(English)#Adding_a_new_page|naming guidelines]].  Also, a forward slash between two words defines an either/or option (e.g. Backup for full/partial configurations) which I don't think is meant to be the case here.
 +
--[[User:Gen2ly|Gen2ly]] 06:16, 12 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
== Comments ==
 +
 
Thanks! Neat method for a sync-type backup! The only question I have is what happens if you {{Codeline|dd}} the boot sector (first 512 bytes) instead of running GRUB? --[[User:VitaminJ|VitaminJ]] 22:18, 11 November 2009 (EST)
 
Thanks! Neat method for a sync-type backup! The only question I have is what happens if you {{Codeline|dd}} the boot sector (first 512 bytes) instead of running GRUB? --[[User:VitaminJ|VitaminJ]] 22:18, 11 November 2009 (EST)
  

Revision as of 11:16, 12 December 2009

Suggestions

Page title does not use naming guidelines. Also, a forward slash between two words defines an either/or option (e.g. Backup for full/partial configurations) which I don't think is meant to be the case here. --Gen2ly 06:16, 12 December 2009 (EST)

Comments

Thanks! Neat method for a sync-type backup! The only question I have is what happens if you Template:Codeline the boot sector (first 512 bytes) instead of running GRUB? --VitaminJ 22:18, 11 November 2009 (EST)


I don't know if it works with dd, since the partitioning scheme can be different on the two harddrives.

  • I vote for merging this with rsync.
  • I second the vote.

Wooptoo 07:14, 2 December 2009 (EST) --Keiichi 20:59, 2 December 2009 (EST)