Difference between revisions of "Talk:Full system backup with rsync"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Suggestions: sign)
m (Suggestions: - Well done on edits.)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Page title does not use [[ArchWiki_Tutorial_(English)#Adding_a_new_page|naming guidelines]].  Also, a forward slash between two words defines an either/or option (e.g. Backup for full/partial configurations) which I don't think is meant to be the case here.
 
Page title does not use [[ArchWiki_Tutorial_(English)#Adding_a_new_page|naming guidelines]].  Also, a forward slash between two words defines an either/or option (e.g. Backup for full/partial configurations) which I don't think is meant to be the case here.
 +
 
--[[User:Gen2ly|Gen2ly]] 06:16, 12 December 2009 (EST)
 
--[[User:Gen2ly|Gen2ly]] 06:16, 12 December 2009 (EST)
  
Line 7: Line 8:
  
 
:''Full System Backup with rsync''? If not, go ahead and change it. [[User:Time|Time]] 07:14, 12 December 2009 (EST)
 
:''Full System Backup with rsync''? If not, go ahead and change it. [[User:Time|Time]] 07:14, 12 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:: Just got a chance to read the article, nice work.
 +
:: --[[User:Gen2ly|Gen2ly]] 14:32, 13 December 2009 (EST)
  
 
== Comments ==
 
== Comments ==

Revision as of 19:32, 13 December 2009

Suggestions

Page title does not use naming guidelines. Also, a forward slash between two words defines an either/or option (e.g. Backup for full/partial configurations) which I don't think is meant to be the case here.

--Gen2ly 06:16, 12 December 2009 (EST)

The slash was supposed to be a subpage. It looks like that's disabled in this wiki for article namespace (as it is in Wikipedia) so I'll just change it. Time 07:05, 12 December 2009 (EST)
Full System Backup with rsync? If not, go ahead and change it. Time 07:14, 12 December 2009 (EST)
Just got a chance to read the article, nice work.
--Gen2ly 14:32, 13 December 2009 (EST)

Comments

Thanks! Neat method for a sync-type backup! The only question I have is what happens if you Template:Codeline the boot sector (first 512 bytes) instead of running GRUB? --VitaminJ 22:18, 11 November 2009 (EST)


I don't know if it works with dd, since the partitioning scheme can be different on the two harddrives.

  • I vote for merging this with rsync.
  • I second the vote.

Wooptoo 07:14, 2 December 2009 (EST) --Keiichi 20:59, 2 December 2009 (EST)