Difference between revisions of "Talk:GNOME/Web"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Fengchao moved page Talk:Epiphany to Talk:GNOME Web: Application renamed.)
(nspluginwrapper and lib32-flashplugin: Remove closed discussion.)
Line 1: Line 1:
== <s> nspluginwrapper and lib32-flashplugin </s> ==
 
Epiphany doesn't require to use nspluginwrapper and lib32-flashplugin anymore.
 
On a 64-bit machine flashplugin is enough to echo flash content.
 
: Fixed. Close. -- [[User:Fengchao|Fengchao]] ([[User talk:Fengchao|talk]]) 10:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 
 
 
== New name ==
 
== New name ==
 
Its new name is "Web". Should we rename this page?  https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/3.4/
 
Its new name is "Web". Should we rename this page?  https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/3.4/

Revision as of 13:03, 22 September 2013

New name

Its new name is "Web". Should we rename this page? https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/3.4/

Yes please. If you're going to do it, don't forget to move this talk page too, and it would be great if you updated as many backlinks as possible (at least the English ones). -- Kynikos (talk) 09:49, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
I think Web is too generic. What about Gnome Web? -- Fengchao (talk) 10:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
I like it, maybe GNOME Web (the GNOME devs could have been more creative in renaming the application... ^^) What about also creating a redirect from Web (web browser) like Wikipedia:Web (web browser)? -- Kynikos (talk) 10:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC)