Difference between revisions of "Talk:GUID Partition Table"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(KiB to KB, explanation?: new section)
(KiB to KB, explanation?: re)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
--[[User:Lonaowna|Lonaowna]] ([[User talk:Lonaowna|talk]]) 08:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Lonaowna|Lonaowna]] ([[User talk:Lonaowna|talk]]) 08:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Although [[User:Polyzen|Polyzen]] should have indeed explained the reason for his edits using the edit summary, I think that the problem here is not what is the international standard, but what are the actual lengths in bytes to be represented case by case. It's easier if I give an example: the [[#Problems with MBR]] section says ''"MBR stores partition sector information using 32-bit LBA values. This LBA length along with 512 byte sector size (more commonly used) limits the maximum addressable size of the disk to be 2 '''TB/TiB'''. Any space beyond 2 '''TB/TiB''' cannot be defined as a partition if MBR partitioning is used"''; now, (2 ^ 32) * 512 = 2199023255552 B = 2 TB, so I guess in this case TB is ok, while TiB would be ok if 500-byte sectors were used (is it even possible? I don't remember...)
 +
:This is just my interpretation, though, I'll try to invite [[User:Polyzen|Polyzen]] to participate.
 +
:-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 14:05, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:05, 10 May 2013

grub-legacy patch

@Hokasch: GPT Patch exists in the svn repo for grub-legacy package but it is not used in the PKGBUILD. Keshav P R 20:25, 10 Aug 2010 (IST)

grub-legacy patch is dropped upstream. grub-legacy is dropped in Arch. Close. -- Fengchao (talk) 11:59, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

KiB to KB, explanation?

Polyzen just made these unexplained edits, replacing all occurences of KiB, MiB and GiB with KB, MB and GB:

Is there a reason for this? Wikipedia:KiB clearly explains that KiB is an international standard. Using KB instead of KiB leads to ambiguity. This can be problematic, especially concerning partitioning (=this article). I propose undoing these edits unless Polyzen has a good reason for them.

--Lonaowna (talk) 08:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Although Polyzen should have indeed explained the reason for his edits using the edit summary, I think that the problem here is not what is the international standard, but what are the actual lengths in bytes to be represented case by case. It's easier if I give an example: the #Problems with MBR section says "MBR stores partition sector information using 32-bit LBA values. This LBA length along with 512 byte sector size (more commonly used) limits the maximum addressable size of the disk to be 2 TB/TiB. Any space beyond 2 TB/TiB cannot be defined as a partition if MBR partitioning is used"; now, (2 ^ 32) * 512 = 2199023255552 B = 2 TB, so I guess in this case TB is ok, while TiB would be ok if 500-byte sectors were used (is it even possible? I don't remember...)
This is just my interpretation, though, I'll try to invite Polyzen to participate.
-- Kynikos (talk) 14:05, 10 May 2013 (UTC)