Difference between revisions of "Talk:Haskell"

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Stack for package management?: Fix to match style guide)
(Explain my motivation of why to install stack from upstream)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
== Stack for package management? ==
 
== Stack for package management? ==
 
The page currently only mentions cabal-install. [http://haskellstack.org/ Stack] seems to be an easier way of setting up Haskell environments and getting dependencies (For instance: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/turtle-1.2.8/docs/Turtle-Tutorial.html) [[User:Crasm|Crasm]] ([[User talk:Crasm|talk]]) 22:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 
The page currently only mentions cabal-install. [http://haskellstack.org/ Stack] seems to be an easier way of setting up Haskell environments and getting dependencies (For instance: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/turtle-1.2.8/docs/Turtle-Tutorial.html) [[User:Crasm|Crasm]] ([[User talk:Crasm|talk]]) 22:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 +
 +
 +
- I tried to imply on the first sentence that you can also use Stack if you want: "You can use Stack but..." but I was focusing on explaining how to get a cabal-install that works and links statically.
 +
- About using stack from the repo (https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/stack/) or the upstream version manually installed, is about if having any haskell-* package installed is incompatible with this new cabal-install we are building. We'd need to check, because maybe installing stack from the repo and bringing those haskell-* packages doesn't affect the linking. Otherwise I was trying to explain how to build a cabal-install in a clean environment. [[User:Jimenezrick|Jimenezrick]] ([[User talk:Jimenezrick|talk]]) 17:59, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:59, 28 August 2017

Stack for package management?

The page currently only mentions cabal-install. Stack seems to be an easier way of setting up Haskell environments and getting dependencies (For instance: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/turtle-1.2.8/docs/Turtle-Tutorial.html) Crasm (talk) 22:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)


- I tried to imply on the first sentence that you can also use Stack if you want: "You can use Stack but..." but I was focusing on explaining how to get a cabal-install that works and links statically. - About using stack from the repo (https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/stack/) or the upstream version manually installed, is about if having any haskell-* package installed is incompatible with this new cabal-install we are building. We'd need to check, because maybe installing stack from the repo and bringing those haskell-* packages doesn't affect the linking. Otherwise I was trying to explain how to build a cabal-install in a clean environment. Jimenezrick (talk) 17:59, 28 August 2017 (UTC)