From ArchWiki
Revision as of 08:13, 25 September 2017 by Fylwind (talk | contribs) (Section: "Building statically linked packages with Cabal (without using shared libraries)": re)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Stack for package management?

The page currently only mentions cabal-install. Stack seems to be an easier way of setting up Haskell environments and getting dependencies (For instance: Crasm (talk) 22:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

- I made more clear Stack is available as an alternative build too, but I tried to imply on the first sentence that you can also use Stack if you want: "You can use Stack but..." but I was focusing on explaining how to get a cabal-install that works and links statically.

- About using stack from the repo ( or the upstream version manually installed, is about if having any haskell-* package installed is incompatible with this new cabal-install we are building. We'd need to check, because maybe installing stack from the repo and bringing those haskell-* packages doesn't affect the linking. Otherwise I was trying to explain how to build a cabal-install in a clean environment. Jimenezrick (talk) 17:59, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Section: "Building statically linked packages with Cabal (without using shared libraries)"

There's an easier way to install statically linked packages using Cabal, as described in the article. Therefore, I think this section is no longer necessary. --Fylwind (talk) 22:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Regardless, please read ArchWiki:Contributing#Do not make complex edits at once and follow it in the future. The diff for your last edit is almost perfect anti-example for this rule. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 05:51, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, I'll keep that in mind in the future. --Fylwind (talk) 08:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)