Difference between revisions of "Talk:Haskell package guidelines"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(no haddocks?)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Guidelines ==
 
== Guidelines ==
 
So from reading the Guidelines section, am I given to understand Arch will not be distributing packages with Haddock docs generated or profiling enabled? --[[User:Gwern|gwern]] 06:25, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 
So from reading the Guidelines section, am I given to understand Arch will not be distributing packages with Haddock docs generated or profiling enabled? --[[User:Gwern|gwern]] 06:25, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== about http://code.haskell.org/arch binaries ==
 +
 +
could those binaries be more easily accessible from pacman?
 +
 +
it is quite easy as in: [[Custom_local_repository]]
 +
 +
also, what's the plan for i686 binaries?
 +
--[[User:Vogt|Vogt]] 23:17, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 11:02, 17 March 2012

Guidelines

So from reading the Guidelines section, am I given to understand Arch will not be distributing packages with Haddock docs generated or profiling enabled? --gwern 06:25, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

about http://code.haskell.org/arch binaries

could those binaries be more easily accessible from pacman?

it is quite easy as in: Custom_local_repository

also, what's the plan for i686 binaries? --Vogt 23:17, 15 June 2008 (EDT)