Difference between revisions of "Talk:Haskell package guidelines"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Content/Headline disconnect: new section)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
also, what's the plan for i686 binaries?
 
also, what's the plan for i686 binaries?
 
--[[User:Vogt|Vogt]] 23:17, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 
--[[User:Vogt|Vogt]] 23:17, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Content/Headline disconnect ==
 +
 +
Is it just me or do the contents of this page have nothing to do with packaging Haskell? If I'm not mistaken this isn't supposed to be about Haskell packages.
 +
[[User:IDex|IDex]] ([[User talk:IDex|talk]]) 10:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:50, 27 May 2013

Guidelines

So from reading the Guidelines section, am I given to understand Arch will not be distributing packages with Haddock docs generated or profiling enabled? --gwern 06:25, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

about http://code.haskell.org/arch binaries

could those binaries be more easily accessible from pacman?

it is quite easy as in: Custom_local_repository

also, what's the plan for i686 binaries? --Vogt 23:17, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

Content/Headline disconnect

Is it just me or do the contents of this page have nothing to do with packaging Haskell? If I'm not mistaken this isn't supposed to be about Haskell packages. IDex (talk) 10:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)