Difference between revisions of "Talk:Haskell package guidelines"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Content/Headline disconnect)
(about http://code.haskell.org/arch binaries: remove section. dated from 2008. the link in the section heading 404d)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Guidelines ==
 
== Guidelines ==
 
So from reading the Guidelines section, am I given to understand Arch will not be distributing packages with Haddock docs generated or profiling enabled? --[[User:Gwern|gwern]] 06:25, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 
So from reading the Guidelines section, am I given to understand Arch will not be distributing packages with Haddock docs generated or profiling enabled? --[[User:Gwern|gwern]] 06:25, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 
== about http://code.haskell.org/arch binaries ==
 
 
could those binaries be more easily accessible from pacman?
 
 
it is quite easy as in: [[Custom_local_repository]]
 
 
also, what's the plan for i686 binaries?
 
--[[User:Vogt|Vogt]] 23:17, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 
  
 
== Content/Headline disconnect ==
 
== Content/Headline disconnect ==

Revision as of 15:34, 27 May 2013

Guidelines

So from reading the Guidelines section, am I given to understand Arch will not be distributing packages with Haddock docs generated or profiling enabled? --gwern 06:25, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Content/Headline disconnect

Is it just me or do the contents of this page have nothing to do with packaging Haskell? If I'm not mistaken this isn't supposed to be about Haskell packages in general. IDex (talk) 10:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)