Difference between revisions of "Talk:Haskell package guidelines"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(about http://code.haskell.org/arch binaries)
(Guidelines: removed section from 2008)
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Guidelines ==
+
== Content/Headline disconnect ==
So from reading the Guidelines section, am I given to understand Arch will not be distributing packages with Haddock docs generated or profiling enabled? --[[User:Gwern|gwern]] 06:25, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
+
  
== about http://code.haskell.org/arch binaries ==
+
Is it just me or do the contents of this page have nothing to do with packaging Haskell? If I'm not mistaken this isn't supposed to be about Haskell packages in general.
 
+
[[User:IDex|IDex]] ([[User talk:IDex|talk]]) 10:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
could those binaries be more easily accessible from pacman?
+
 
+
it is quite easy as in: [[Custom_local_repository]]
+
 
+
also, what's the plan for i686 binaries?
+

Revision as of 15:35, 27 May 2013

Content/Headline disconnect

Is it just me or do the contents of this page have nothing to do with packaging Haskell? If I'm not mistaken this isn't supposed to be about Haskell packages in general. IDex (talk) 10:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)