Difference between revisions of "Talk:Haskell package guidelines"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Lahwaacz moved page Talk:Haskell Package Guidelines to Talk:Haskell package guidelines over redirect: comply with Help:Style#Title)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Guidelines ==
+
== Creating Haskell packaging guidelines ==
So from reading the Guidelines section, am I given to understand Arch will not be distributing packages with Haddock docs generated or profiling enabled? --[[User:Gwern|gwern]] 06:25, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
+
  
== about http://code.haskell.org/arch binaries ==
+
Since there aren't any Haskell package guidelines (this page has existed for a while, but hasn't contained guidelines for over a year), is anyone willing to step in and help writing some? [[User:Ndt|Ndt]] ([[User talk:Ndt|talk]]) 01:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
  
could those binaries be more easily accessible from pacman?
+
== Content/Headline disconnect ==
  
it is quite easy as in: [[Custom_local_repository]]
+
Is it just me or do the contents of this page have nothing to do with packaging Haskell? If I'm not mistaken this isn't supposed to be about Haskell packages in general.
 
+
[[User:IDex|IDex]] ([[User talk:IDex|talk]]) 10:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
also, what's the plan for i686 binaries?
+
:No you are right and it overlaps content from the [[Haskell]] page. [[User:X-dark|X-dark]] ([[User talk:X-dark|talk]]) 10:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
--[[User:Vogt|Vogt]] 23:17, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
+

Latest revision as of 16:29, 6 November 2014

Creating Haskell packaging guidelines

Since there aren't any Haskell package guidelines (this page has existed for a while, but hasn't contained guidelines for over a year), is anyone willing to step in and help writing some? Ndt (talk) 01:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Content/Headline disconnect

Is it just me or do the contents of this page have nothing to do with packaging Haskell? If I'm not mistaken this isn't supposed to be about Haskell packages in general. IDex (talk) 10:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

No you are right and it overlaps content from the Haskell page. X-dark (talk) 10:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)