Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jekyll"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(clarification needed)
 
(Reply to X33a)
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
@ Filam
 
  
 +
== @ Filam ==
 
You edited the Arch User Repository (Alternate) section, but using the AUR template doesn't work in this case, as there is no package named jekyll in the AUR. It gives a 404 not found.
 
You edited the Arch User Repository (Alternate) section, but using the AUR template doesn't work in this case, as there is no package named jekyll in the AUR. It gives a 404 not found.
  
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
I suggest you revert the change, or maybe we should mention that the package is ruby-jekyll in AUR, and use {{AUR|ruby-jekyll}} instead.
 
I suggest you revert the change, or maybe we should mention that the package is ruby-jekyll in AUR, and use {{AUR|ruby-jekyll}} instead.
 +
 +
[[User:X33a|X33a]] ([[User talk:X33a|talk]]) 15:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 +
:Fixed, thanks. ~ [[User:Filam|Filam]] ([[User talk:Filam|talk]]) 03:38, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:38, 3 December 2012

@ Filam

You edited the Arch User Repository (Alternate) section, but using the AUR template doesn't work in this case, as there is no package named jekyll in the AUR. It gives a 404 not found.

The package is ruby-jekyll. Hence i used the following style.

Jekyll

I suggest you revert the change, or maybe we should mention that the package is ruby-jekyll in AUR, and use ruby-jekyllAUR instead.

X33a (talk) 15:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Fixed, thanks. ~ Filam (talk) 03:38, 3 December 2012 (UTC)