Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kernels/Arch Build System"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(added my experience following the directions)
Line 1: Line 1:
* I am doing this now and 2 dependencies have shown up that are not documented,  bc and xmlto.  Or maybe these used to be installed with base-devel but no longer are.
+
*I am doing this now and 2 dependencies have shown up that are not documented,  bc and xmlto.  Or maybe these used to be installed with base-devel but no longer are.
 +
[[User:SanjeevKSharma|SanjeevKSharma]] ([[User talk:SanjeevKSharma|talk]]) 15:31, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 +
 
  
 
* If somebody want to keep stock kernel beside custom one, shouldn't be the "provides" array uncommented, and changed to
 
* If somebody want to keep stock kernel beside custom one, shouldn't be the "provides" array uncommented, and changed to

Revision as of 15:31, 27 October 2013

  • I am doing this now and 2 dependencies have shown up that are not documented, bc and xmlto. Or maybe these used to be installed with base-devel but no longer are.

SanjeevKSharma (talk) 15:31, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


  • If somebody want to keep stock kernel beside custom one, shouldn't be the "provides" array uncommented, and changed to

provides=('kernel26' 'linux') ? --4javier 05:27, 10 January 2012 (EST)

should I also uncomment these parts in package_linux-headers() and not only in package_linux()? --Onny 11:08, 8 March 2012 (EST)
  • this page does not mention that every changed .config-file has a new md5sum which should be added into the PKGBUILD --Onny 11:24, 8 March 2012 (EST)