Difference between revisions of "Talk:LibreOffice"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(artwiz-fonts: re)
(artwiz-fonts: close)
Line 1: Line 1:
== artwiz-fonts ==
+
==<s>artwiz-fonts</s>==
  
 
Are artwiz-fonts necessary? I have not them installed but LO is still looking good.
 
Are artwiz-fonts necessary? I have not them installed but LO is still looking good.
Line 8: Line 8:
 
:I suggest removing the reference to artwiz-fonts, and would even consider removing the whole note about fonts.
 
:I suggest removing the reference to artwiz-fonts, and would even consider removing the whole note about fonts.
 
:-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 09:42, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 
:-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 09:42, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 +
:Ok, I've seen you've removed the note, just if next time you could write a "reason" in the edit summary, instead of only "removed such and such" it would make it easier for the other users to understand the edit, thanks ^^ Closed. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 06:21, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:21, 9 May 2013

artwiz-fonts

Are artwiz-fonts necessary? I have not them installed but LO is still looking good.

(please sign your edits in talk pages with ~~~~)
I don't have artwiz-fonts installed either and my LO looks fine too.
This is the history of that paragraph: [1], [2], [3], [4].
artwiz-fonts was added on the OpenOffice.org article 4 years ago by User:Kholddagger, and that's been his only edit ever to an article in the Main namespace.
I suggest removing the reference to artwiz-fonts, and would even consider removing the whole note about fonts.
-- Kynikos (talk) 09:42, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Ok, I've seen you've removed the note, just if next time you could write a "reason" in the edit summary, instead of only "removed such and such" it would make it easier for the other users to understand the edit, thanks ^^ Closed. -- Kynikos (talk) 06:21, 9 May 2013 (UTC)