Difference between revisions of "Talk:LibreOffice"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(artwiz-fonts: close)
m (artwiz-fonts: Remove closed discussion.)
Line 1: Line 1:
Are artwiz-fonts necessary? I have not them installed but LO is still looking good.
:(please sign your edits in talk pages with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>)
:I don't have artwiz-fonts installed either and my LO looks fine too.
:This is the history of that paragraph: [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=OpenOffice.org&diff=next&oldid=66734], [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=OpenOffice.org&diff=prev&oldid=74767], [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=OpenOffice.org&diff=prev&oldid=123725], [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=LibreOffice&diff=169379&oldid=169371].
:{{Pkg|artwiz-fonts}} was added on the [[OpenOffice.org]] article 4 years ago by [[User:Kholddagger]], and that's been his only edit ever to an article in the Main namespace.
:I suggest removing the reference to artwiz-fonts, and would even consider removing the whole note about fonts.
:-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 09:42, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
:Ok, I've seen you've removed the note, just if next time you could write a "reason" in the edit summary, instead of only "removed such and such" it would make it easier for the other users to understand the edit, thanks ^^ Closed. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 06:21, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:51, 11 May 2013