Difference between revisions of "Talk:LightDM"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Yes, it might be a bug, but where? Lightdm is not an official Arch package and the AUR is crowded with different PKGBUILDs which of some are really outdated. So I took some i...")
 
(Remove closed discussion.)
(11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Yes, it might be a bug, but where? Lightdm is not an official Arch package and the AUR is crowded with different PKGBUILDs which of some are really outdated.
+
== Sources of Arch-centric 64x64 Icons ==
 
+
Instead of {{ic|cp}}-ing would it be more appropriate to symlink?
So I took some info from this package; https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55236
+
{{bc|# find /usr/share/archlinux/icons -name "*64*" -exec ln -s {} /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/devices \;}}
in particular its lightdm-autologin.pam and .install file which solved some problems with this package which compiled and installed ok; https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54208
+
--[[User:Alexchamberlain|Alex Chamberlain]] ([[User talk:Alexchamberlain|talk]]) 20:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:39, 15 September 2012

Sources of Arch-centric 64x64 Icons

Instead of cp-ing would it be more appropriate to symlink?

# find /usr/share/archlinux/icons -name "*64*" -exec ln -s {} /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/devices \;

--Alex Chamberlain (talk) 20:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)