Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lightweight Applications"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Change links to arch wiki where topis exists: new section)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
--[[User:Trontonic|Trontonic]] 20:26, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
 
--[[User:Trontonic|Trontonic]] 20:26, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
 
:I wouldn't call anything based on Mozilla "lightweight". And definitely not Firefox, which is an infamous resource hog.—[[User:J. M.|J. M.]] 23:20, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
 
:I wouldn't call anything based on Mozilla "lightweight". And definitely not Firefox, which is an infamous resource hog.—[[User:J. M.|J. M.]] 23:20, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Change links to arch wiki where topis exists ==
 +
 +
Most of programs on list have dedicated page in arch wiki. Now the link from software name points to package homepage and few have link to arch wiki article at the end under HOWTO. I personally would prefere to point directly to arch wiki article (as it is in [[Common_Apps]]). What do you think? If you disagree, I will try to add link to arch wiki under HOWTO.

Revision as of 10:35, 8 May 2009

What are the criteria for what makes software lightweight or not? If Thunderbird is included I find it strange that Firefox isn't included as well. --Trontonic 20:26, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

I wouldn't call anything based on Mozilla "lightweight". And definitely not Firefox, which is an infamous resource hog.—J. M. 23:20, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

Change links to arch wiki where topis exists

Most of programs on list have dedicated page in arch wiki. Now the link from software name points to package homepage and few have link to arch wiki article at the end under HOWTO. I personally would prefere to point directly to arch wiki article (as it is in Common_Apps). What do you think? If you disagree, I will try to add link to arch wiki under HOWTO.