Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lisp package guidelines"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
-- [[User:Veox|Veox]] 06:05, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
 
-- [[User:Veox|Veox]] 06:05, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
package name should follow the prefix cl-packagename, but in the directory structure, conserve the original name.
 +
 +
--[[User:Djgera|Djgera]] 19:41, 28 March 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:41, 28 March 2009

Package Naming

I've added Alexandria to AUR as 'cl-alexandria', because 'alexandria' is already taken by a book collection managing application. It is clear that the directory in /usr/share/common-lisp/ should be named 'alexandria' and not 'cl-alexandria', otherwise code written with it would not be compatible with other distros.

Should we be naming all CL packages with a 'cl-' prefix, or only those that "already" have it (like cl-ppcre and cl-who)?

-- Veox 06:05, 26 March 2009 (EDT)

package name should follow the prefix cl-packagename, but in the directory structure, conserve the original name.

--Djgera 19:41, 28 March 2009 (EDT)