Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of games"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(rm closed discussion)
m (useless)
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
(No difference)

Revision as of 13:01, 30 April 2013

Classification method

Currently, games are first divided in Free/Reimplemented/Commercial/Emulators/MMO and only then they are grouped by genre. I'd like to see the opposite, i.e. first group by genre (also in Template:Games navigation) and only inside each genre make the distinction between native/emulators, free/commercial and whatever distinction better suits that particular genre.

Note that this topic has already been briefly touched on in Talk:Common_Applications/Games/MMO#MMOG by me and AlexanderR, but more opinions are needed.

-- Kynikos 08:45, 5 February 2012 (EST)

+1 -- when browsing games, one would logically search by genre first. The genre classification scheme is more consistent with the other Common Applications pages, too, where applications are organized by type first, then by UI/platform (graphical or console). -- pointone 12:25, 4 March 2012 (EST)

Formatting question

The first letter of the description should be capitalized?

There's no official policy, but it seems that most descriptions start with lowercase unless the first word is a proper name. -- Kynikos 06:15, 5 March 2012 (EST)


Should we start to sort the list alphabetically? Leper 12:24, 26 March 2012 (EDT)

Yep, every improvement is welcome :) -- Kynikos 05:27, 27 March 2012 (EDT)
Sorted Common Applications/Games/Free. I haven't sorted the Java based FPS as that section seemed odd. -- Leper 12:16, 27 March 2012 (EDT)