Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of games"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Suggestions)
(Suggestions)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
Should game links be to existing ArchWiki pages (if they exist) instead of the actual homepage of the game?
 
Should game links be to existing ArchWiki pages (if they exist) instead of the actual homepage of the game?
 
--[[User:Splex|Splex]] 15:27, 27 December 2009 (HKT)
 
--[[User:Splex|Splex]] 15:27, 27 December 2009 (HKT)
 +
 +
I don't think so. It really shouldn't be necessary for a game to have its own wiki page and if it does it probably is an exception. Best we can do is link to both, homepage and wiki entry. I'd still go with homepage only, though. Which games have their own wiki pages on here?
 +
--[[User:Svenstaro|Svenstaro]] 03:00, 27 December 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 08:00, 27 December 2009

Comments

Suggestions

Svenstaro, this page is about game listings. If you think it belongs here, could you add it to the end of the page? --Gen2ly 19:59, 2 December 2009 (EST)

I do believe that this info should be in front since the page is simply called "Games". A general info on games and playing games on Arch with possible issues would seem more appropriate to me than simply a list of games. Perhaps we can agree that an article with a general name as this one would contain some general info too. The article is not called "Game Listing" and thus some info apart from just a list of games should be here. The length of the list alone draws visual attention to it so what would be wrong with having general info for the user first? --Svenstaro 20:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)

Well, we do have a Common Applications, Lightweight Applications, possibly a Gaming Applications?? And then create a Gaming page with general overall information. Thing is, I couldn't really see enough information to really make an article of it. Any ideas? --Gen2ly 20:48, 2 December 2009 (EST)

I say we link to Wikipedia, an outgoing redirection for Lightweight and Games and keep Common. Three articles basically doing the same thing is ridiculous. Either that or we rename Common Applications to something more appropriate and stick everything in there. --Keiichi 20:56, 2 December 2009 (EST)

I have now added my stuff to the Gaming page. It will be improved and iterated on by me and other persons. It is obviously a stub for now. Keiichi, we weren't really discussing about the stuff you now hint at. Perhaps you should bring up this issue on the mailing list? I prefer the Arch application lists to wikipedia, for one. --Svenstaro 21:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)

Should game links be to existing ArchWiki pages (if they exist) instead of the actual homepage of the game? --Splex 15:27, 27 December 2009 (HKT)

I don't think so. It really shouldn't be necessary for a game to have its own wiki page and if it does it probably is an exception. Best we can do is link to both, homepage and wiki entry. I'd still go with homepage only, though. Which games have their own wiki pages on here? --Svenstaro 03:00, 27 December 2009 (EST)