Difference between revisions of "Talk:MPlayer"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Remove closed discussions.)
m (Removing the configuration example?: finish sentence)
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Variable needed  ==
  
 +
I think it might help others who want to play video from the console to know that running 'export SDL_NOMOUSE=1' could be necessary first.
 +
 +
--[[User:Stozi|Stozi]] ([[User talk:Stozi|talk]]) 20:37, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Removing the configuration example? ==
 +
I noticed that removing examples is becoming quite common, but in this case I think is fairly unfair. The example in the manpage (or the link) is almost a joke (e.g., {{ic|flip=yes}} seriously? instead the one in this page was fairly good with also some non obvious configurations (e.g., the audio up/down mix). Can I put it back?
 +
 +
[[User:Ezzetabi|Ezzetabi]] ([[User talk:Ezzetabi|talk]]) 02:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Please add a link to the edit that you don't agree with. -- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 06:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 +
 +
::I'm guessing at [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=MPlayer&diff=324106&oldid=323047] (odd to mention this almost 1 year later). I'm against re-adding it verbatim - syntax tends to change, chosen options are subjective, and descriptions duplicate the manual most of the time. I suppose you could add it to a gist and link to it from the article. -- [[User:Alad|Alad]] ([[User talk:Alad|talk]]) 12:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:55, 9 April 2015

Variable needed

I think it might help others who want to play video from the console to know that running 'export SDL_NOMOUSE=1' could be necessary first.

--Stozi (talk) 20:37, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Removing the configuration example?

I noticed that removing examples is becoming quite common, but in this case I think is fairly unfair. The example in the manpage (or the link) is almost a joke (e.g., flip=yes seriously? instead the one in this page was fairly good with also some non obvious configurations (e.g., the audio up/down mix). Can I put it back?

Ezzetabi (talk) 02:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add a link to the edit that you don't agree with. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 06:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
I'm guessing at [1] (odd to mention this almost 1 year later). I'm against re-adding it verbatim - syntax tends to change, chosen options are subjective, and descriptions duplicate the manual most of the time. I suppose you could add it to a gist and link to it from the article. -- Alad (talk) 12:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)