Difference between revisions of "Talk:Improving performance"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (LZO for btrfs: rm section - Btrfs#Compression mentions lzo, linked from Maximizing_Performance#Btrfs)
(17 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"''Things kinda slow? Buy more ram!''" is really not the kind of advice anyone is looking for. And the CPU section (undervolting, etc.) isn't related to speed improvements, except fan control. This section is sorely lacking a link/howto to/for BFS.<br>
 
--[[User:Gog|Gog]] 20:36, 24 October 2009 (EDT)
 
  
:To my knowledge keeping the CPU cool does not improve performance so I removed this part. I also removed the introduction about RAM. So, problems solved ?
 
:[[User:Changaco|Changaco]] 11:25, 25 October 2009 (EDT)
 
 
::I'm not an expert, but doesn't overheating decrease performance? If it is, then preventing overheating should count as maximizing performance. If not, then the section is indeed irrelevant. I found this article saying it does for pentium 4 processors: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/p4-temp.html . But as I said I'm no expert, so what do you think?
 
::--Rttommy
 
 
:::I'm not an expert either, maybe we should undo my change but edit in order not to present this as an absolute truth.
 
:::[[User:Changaco|Changaco]] 14:13, 25 October 2009 (EDT)
 
 
:::I think that fan control should be left in since it's generally considered to be related with overclocking. And another thing: let's keep the article's title in tandem with the heading's cases... "Maximizing Performance" or "Maximizing '''p'''erformance"? the second one matches the headings...
 
:::--[[User:Gog|Gog]] 19:22, 25 October 2009 (EDT)
 
 
----
 
 
Section "The desktop switcheroo" does not make sense. [[User:Manolo|manolo]] 16:35, 7 November 2009 (EST)
 

Revision as of 13:04, 21 August 2013