Difference between revisions of "Talk:Multilib"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Detailed reason for page re-write + question about footnotes/references.)
(Multilib page re-written: Inline links or simple list instead of footnotes?)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
[[User:Bastian|Bastian]] ([[User talk:Bastian|talk]]) 21:53, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 
[[User:Bastian|Bastian]] ([[User talk:Bastian|talk]]) 21:53, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
:In addition I suggest renaming the page [[Multilib]] (currently redirecting to the current [[Multilib Project]] name). Also perhaps merge the stuff under [[Arch64 FAQ#Multilib Repository - Multilib Project]]. [[User:Vadmium|Vadmium]] ([[User talk:Vadmium|talk]]) 01:17, 18 May 2012 (UTC).
 +
 +
=== Footnotes ===
 +
 +
I think the inline links you made above are a good enough start. If you really want clickable footnotes you could try emulating their [[Wikipedia:Template:Ref]] family of templates, but I’d rather keep it all inline, or as a simple list at the bottom of the page. The only thing I would say is to include a bit of context in the linking; perhaps something like “[http://www.redhat.com/magazine/009jul05/features/multilib/ 64-bit computing: Co-existing in a 32-bit world]” in ''Red Hat Magazine'', or [https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1103220#p1103220 Reply by Wonder] to “Archlinux Multilib Directory Structure” thread. [[User:Vadmium|Vadmium]] ([[User talk:Vadmium|talk]]) 01:17, 18 May 2012 (UTC).
  
 
== Engrish ==
 
== Engrish ==

Revision as of 01:17, 18 May 2012

Multilib page re-written

Hi! I erased the old page since everything was out of date and then I wrote all I know about Multilib. Please revert my edit if you believe it was unnecessary to do so.

The current content is written so a beginner with basic computer knowledge will understand the purpose of multilib. I am a beginner and I was reading the Beginner's Guide when I stumbled upon a link to this outdated article. I didn't know what multilib was, but after reading this article from redhat I understand it better. The article currently reflects my findings in the above article and this forum post where I asked what Directory Structure Multilib for Archlinux makes use of. However, this wiki does not have the Cite extension nor seems to have the References extension installed, so I don't know how to link to these articles as my source. The Help:Editing article does not make any mention on how to do footnotes or references either. Your help is greatly appreciated!

Bastian (talk) 21:53, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

In addition I suggest renaming the page Multilib (currently redirecting to the current Multilib Project name). Also perhaps merge the stuff under Arch64 FAQ#Multilib Repository - Multilib Project. Vadmium (talk) 01:17, 18 May 2012 (UTC).

Footnotes

I think the inline links you made above are a good enough start. If you really want clickable footnotes you could try emulating their Wikipedia:Template:Ref family of templates, but I’d rather keep it all inline, or as a simple list at the bottom of the page. The only thing I would say is to include a bit of context in the linking; perhaps something like “64-bit computing: Co-existing in a 32-bit world” in Red Hat Magazine, or Reply by Wonder to “Archlinux Multilib Directory Structure” thread. Vadmium (talk) 01:17, 18 May 2012 (UTC).

Engrish

Hi,

When we install gcc-multilib, it is in conflict with the "classic" gcc, it would be greate to have a cross compil gcc like for mingw32 isn't it ?

Thanks.