Difference between revisions of "Talk:Network Time Protocol daemon"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Update i18n links: re)
(23 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
According to [https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=150415 this post in the forum], the hwclock daemon is not necessary anymore thanks to systemd, so I'm willing to update this page unless someone have a objection. [[User:Tae|Tae]] ([[User talk:Tae|talk]]) 20:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 +
 
This article has been created after splitting "Network Time Protocol" into this and OpenNTPD as discussed [https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=112698 here] -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 16:03, 11 February 2011 (EST)
 
This article has been created after splitting "Network Time Protocol" into this and OpenNTPD as discussed [https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=112698 here] -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 16:03, 11 February 2011 (EST)
  
===<s>Update i18n links</s>===
+
I find this article quite confusing.  My use case is simply that I want to make sure my machine time is sync'd.  I'd suggest that at (or near) the top of the article (before the section on setting up a server) you have info on the canonical approach for this.  The part where this is at the moment is quite bad.
Note that the i18n links still point to "Network Time Protocol" instead of "Network Time Protocol daemon": this should be changed if also the other wikis split the original article like this. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 16:58, 11 February 2011 (EST)
+
 
:[https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Network_Time_Protocol_daemon&action=historysubmit&diff=154974&oldid=152801 Fixed], also for the other langauges. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 05:49, 3 September 2011 (EDT)
+
What's the canonical approach daemon or no daemon?
  
===ntpd -qg===
+
Once selected, what's all the warnings about hwclock. Again, canonicalIf hwclock needs to be turned off, just state that, not in RED!  Hope those comments help the article???  Also there are references to rc.conf...shouldn't this be deprecated?  Up front, on top, the systemd approach probably.
Why is {{ic|-g}} required in {{ic|ntpd -qg}} in Using without daemon? It allows to adjust time by more than 15 min without a warning, which seems like a very specialized need. If there isn't something I don't know, I'd like to remove {{ic|-g}} from there. - [[User:Corvinus|Corvinus]] 10:28, 3 December 2011 (EST)
+
:Sorry for the delay of this answer. From man ntpd: ''Normally, ntpd exits with a message to the system log if the offset exceeds the panic threshold, which is 1000 s  by  defaultThis option'' (-g) ''allows the time to be set to any value without restriction; however, this can happen only once. If the threshold is exceeded after that, ntpd will exit with a message to the system log.''
+
:Not only the -g option causes no harm, but since you're running ntpd only at boot time, you can't predict whether the clock is off by more than 15 minutes or not, and if it is, without the -g option it won't be adjusted.
+
:Googling it just a bit gives you some references, e.g. [http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2011-October/030766.html].
+
:I'm restoring the -g option, but please feel free to continue the discussion if you can find some counter-arguments :)
+
:-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 16:17, 15 December 2011 (EST)
+

Revision as of 18:50, 14 February 2013

According to this post in the forum, the hwclock daemon is not necessary anymore thanks to systemd, so I'm willing to update this page unless someone have a objection. Tae (talk) 20:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

This article has been created after splitting "Network Time Protocol" into this and OpenNTPD as discussed here -- Kynikos 16:03, 11 February 2011 (EST)

I find this article quite confusing. My use case is simply that I want to make sure my machine time is sync'd. I'd suggest that at (or near) the top of the article (before the section on setting up a server) you have info on the canonical approach for this. The part where this is at the moment is quite bad.

What's the canonical approach daemon or no daemon?

Once selected, what's all the warnings about hwclock. Again, canonical. If hwclock needs to be turned off, just state that, not in RED! Hope those comments help the article??? Also there are references to rc.conf...shouldn't this be deprecated? Up front, on top, the systemd approach probably.