Talk:Opera

From ArchWiki
Revision as of 18:36, 1 October 2012 by Alexfikl (Talk | contribs) (Java on Arch64 accuracy dispute: closed)

Jump to: navigation, search

Comment

Well, this is my first article here, hope it won't get considered for deletion! :)

Edit comments should go in the edit summary, closed. -- Kynikos (talk) 02:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Java and Opera

Did someone get java (openJDK6 or sun-jre) to work with opera? I have failed repeatedly, and would appreciate very much if anyone could write down how to do it. ~whoppix

Outdated, closed. -- Kynikos (talk) 02:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Arch64 fix

I had problems with java on Opera with Arch64, fixed it and added a part under troubleshooting. If same fix works for Arch i686, edit and remove 'on Arch64'. --Duologic May 24, 2009

Outdated, closed. -- Kynikos (talk) 02:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Check arch64 section

Took out a lot of cruft from Opera <10. I haven't revised the arch64 section because I can't verify wether it's obsolete or not. UNIVAC 20:54, 24 September 2009 (EDT)

Outdated, closed. -- Kynikos (talk) 02:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

pacman-less installation

"Also note that this installation will not be monitored by pacman, so it is only recommended for advanced users." Shouldn't this be "it is not recommended"? I think it should be considered (very) bad practice to bypass pacman. vjokelai March 4, 2010

Outdated, closed. -- Kynikos (talk) 02:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Java on Arch64 accuracy dispute

On March 17th, Swarmer removed a section in Troubleshooting without providing explanation, so I restored it with some modifications: if somebody can confirm it having become obsolete, it can be removed definitively. -- Kynikos 10:46, 18 March 2011 (EDT)

I just tried Opera with a clean Java installation (as clean as I could make it anyway, locate didn't find anything java/jre/jdk/icedtea related) and it seems to work properly without any modifications, even though libjvm.so is still only in the server/ folder. -- Alexfikl (talk) 09:13, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
If you think the section is no longer needed, just remove it; if you think it needs adaptations, adapt it and remove the Accuracy template. In any case, always explain your actions in the Edit Summary, although I know you're a good user who always does that ^^ (PS, once you're done, remember also to close this discussion by striking its heading) -- Kynikos (talk) 14:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Ok, deleted. I remembered there was a similar comment on the Octave page when installing octave-javaAUR and that was outdated as well.
Also, thanks a lot for the kind words! -- Alexfikl (talk)