Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pacman/Tips and tricks"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(non working commands)
m (Simple vs complex tip)
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
This is an excellent candidate for merging with [[pacman]].  Just put this one at the bottom of the other, in a special "Tips" section.  It would be good to keep all articles on one subject together in one place for the sake of simplicity and organization; the KISS way. - [[User:KitchM|KitchM]] 11:39, 23 January 2010 (EST)
 
This is an excellent candidate for merging with [[pacman]].  Just put this one at the bottom of the other, in a special "Tips" section.  It would be good to keep all articles on one subject together in one place for the sake of simplicity and organization; the KISS way. - [[User:KitchM|KitchM]] 11:39, 23 January 2010 (EST)
  
 +
== Simple vs complex tip ==
  
== Non working commands ==
+
"Listing changed configuration files", first tip: does it work?
 
+
I find it confusing. The second one do the job. Is there a reason to keep the first?
This one [[#Listing_official_installed_packages_only]] throws a prompt in your face. Is something missing? --[[User:Maevius|Maevius]] ([[User talk:Maevius|talk]]) 11:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
+
:The script works for me, so I kept it and added the one-liner. -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] ([[User talk:Karol|talk]]) 01:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 +
::I have inverted them because I guess the shorter is handier so it is worth to be read first [[User:Flu|Flu]] ([[User talk:Flu|talk]]) 20:35, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:35, 24 February 2013

Merge

This is an excellent candidate for merging with pacman. Just put this one at the bottom of the other, in a special "Tips" section. It would be good to keep all articles on one subject together in one place for the sake of simplicity and organization; the KISS way. - KitchM 11:39, 23 January 2010 (EST)

Simple vs complex tip

"Listing changed configuration files", first tip: does it work? I find it confusing. The second one do the job. Is there a reason to keep the first?

The script works for me, so I kept it and added the one-liner. -- Karol (talk) 01:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
I have inverted them because I guess the shorter is handier so it is worth to be read first Flu (talk) 20:35, 24 February 2013 (UTC)