Difference between revisions of "Talk:Python"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "== Section Misc.Uses == I would remove the "Misc. Uses" section altogether ("Python is excellent for emergency situations"???) ~~~~")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I would remove the "Misc. Uses" section altogether ("Python is excellent for emergency situations"???) [[User:Tokland|Tokland]] 06:12, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
 
I would remove the "Misc. Uses" section altogether ("Python is excellent for emergency situations"???) [[User:Tokland|Tokland]] 06:12, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Section Python Versions ==
 +
 +
See, this is why I'm seriously looking for an alternativie to Arch (which is sad, since I've been using Arch for almost a year now and it really is overall a nice distro) BUT - most python scripts I use still rely on 2.x (and why they HAD to break that I am still unclear on) yet Arch decided to make pythion 3.x the default, making most of my python scripts unusable without massive user inervention. Pity. You've lost my faith. I may have to break down and revert to Debian - or Fedora - or (shudder) Suse. Oh if only FreeBSD had native flash support.

Revision as of 01:44, 19 November 2010

Section Misc.Uses

I would remove the "Misc. Uses" section altogether ("Python is excellent for emergency situations"???) Tokland 06:12, 25 October 2010 (EDT)

Section Python Versions

See, this is why I'm seriously looking for an alternativie to Arch (which is sad, since I've been using Arch for almost a year now and it really is overall a nice distro) BUT - most python scripts I use still rely on 2.x (and why they HAD to break that I am still unclear on) yet Arch decided to make pythion 3.x the default, making most of my python scripts unusable without massive user inervention. Pity. You've lost my faith. I may have to break down and revert to Debian - or Fedora - or (shudder) Suse. Oh if only FreeBSD had native flash support.