Difference between revisions of "Talk:Python"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Section Python Versions: rm closed discussion)
(Remove Section "Misc. Uses")
Line 1: Line 1:
== Remove Section "Misc. Uses" ==
+
== <s> Remove Section "Misc. Uses" </s> ==
  
 
I would remove the "Misc. Uses" section altogether ("Python is excellent for emergency situations"???) <br />-- [[User:Tokland|Tokland]] 06:12, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
 
I would remove the "Misc. Uses" section altogether ("Python is excellent for emergency situations"???) <br />-- [[User:Tokland|Tokland]] 06:12, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
 
:I agree that the "Misc. Uses" section doesn't seem appropriate for the ArchWiki. The information in there seems like something I would expect to read on a blog, not on here. If anyone else agrees, I'll remove that section entirely.
 
:I agree that the "Misc. Uses" section doesn't seem appropriate for the ArchWiki. The information in there seems like something I would expect to read on a blog, not on here. If anyone else agrees, I'll remove that section entirely.
 
:-- [[User:Jstjohn|Jstjohn]] ([[User talk:Jstjohn|talk]]) 16:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 
:-- [[User:Jstjohn|Jstjohn]] ([[User talk:Jstjohn|talk]]) 16:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 +
:: Done. Close. -- [[User:Fengchao|Fengchao]] ([[User talk:Fengchao|talk]]) 04:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:05, 8 November 2012

Remove Section "Misc. Uses"

I would remove the "Misc. Uses" section altogether ("Python is excellent for emergency situations"???)
-- Tokland 06:12, 25 October 2010 (EDT)

I agree that the "Misc. Uses" section doesn't seem appropriate for the ArchWiki. The information in there seems like something I would expect to read on a blog, not on here. If anyone else agrees, I'll remove that section entirely.
-- Jstjohn (talk) 16:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Done. Close. -- Fengchao (talk) 04:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)