Difference between revisions of "Talk:Redmine"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Installation steps)
(Sqlite 3 for production)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
== Sqlite 3 for production ==
 
== Sqlite 3 for production ==
 
Why is sqlite3 not considered for production? sqlite3 is stable, pretty fast for minor installations and easy to backup. We have at least three production installation so far for a couple of years with no issues.
 
Why is sqlite3 not considered for production? sqlite3 is stable, pretty fast for minor installations and easy to backup. We have at least three production installation so far for a couple of years with no issues.
 +
: It's not my opinion, it's a recommendation from Redmine site because some limitations that they have with the SQLite (ref.: http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineInstall). -- [[User:mawcomw|mawcomw]] ([[User talk:mawcomw|talk]]) 16:24, 02 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:25, 2 May 2013

Installation steps

I'm pretty sure you don't have to detail the steps for installing the package from the AUR. No other page does this. See Linux-ck and Courier_MTA for instance. I'd recommend copying the style of the Courier MTA article. SidK (talk) 15:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC) Sid

Fixed. Thanks for reporting. Close -- Fengchao (talk) 05:53, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I will clean up the steps describing AUR installation. -- mawcomw (talk) 18:37, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Sqlite 3 for production

Why is sqlite3 not considered for production? sqlite3 is stable, pretty fast for minor installations and easy to backup. We have at least three production installation so far for a couple of years with no issues.

It's not my opinion, it's a recommendation from Redmine site because some limitations that they have with the SQLite (ref.: http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineInstall). -- mawcomw (talk) 16:24, 02 May 2013 (UTC)