Difference between revisions of "Talk:Domain name resolution"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (added signature)
(UncensoredDNS port numbers: information checked)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
I am wondering whether the information on port 53 & 5353 is relevant or of any interest. Isn't it multicast that uses UDP on 5353? Some reference would be welcome. I would happily rewrite the paragraph if there is no objection.  
 
I am wondering whether the information on port 53 & 5353 is relevant or of any interest. Isn't it multicast that uses UDP on 5353? Some reference would be welcome. I would happily rewrite the paragraph if there is no objection.  
 
[[User:Kewl|Kewl]] ([[User talk:Kewl|talk]]) 20:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 
[[User:Kewl|Kewl]] ([[User talk:Kewl|talk]]) 20:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 +
 +
:I have found an announcement from ‏ @censurfridns 8 Dec 2013 on Twitter "Due to popular request ns1 and ns2 now listen on port 5353 as well as the standard 53, for those of you with ISPs hijacking port 53 traffic!" and have checked it is still the case with the new servers and will therefore update accordingly [[User:Kewl|Kewl]] ([[User talk:Kewl|talk]]) 08:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:57, 30 September 2017

UncensoredDNS port numbers

I am wondering whether the information on port 53 & 5353 is relevant or of any interest. Isn't it multicast that uses UDP on 5353? Some reference would be welcome. I would happily rewrite the paragraph if there is no objection. Kewl (talk) 20:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

I have found an announcement from ‏ @censurfridns 8 Dec 2013 on Twitter "Due to popular request ns1 and ns2 now listen on port 5353 as well as the standard 53, for those of you with ISPs hijacking port 53 traffic!" and have checked it is still the case with the new servers and will therefore update accordingly Kewl (talk) 08:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)