Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rip Audio CDs"

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(rm old discussion)
(Future direction of article: re)
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Future direction of article ==
  
 +
I'd like to preserve this article if possible.  I believe this is a good reason because the article [[Optical_disc_drive]] is big.  This discussion may even start a sub-discussion of the purview of that article, but for me, I'm going to keep the my comments to this article.  I think this article is necessary because Digital Audio Extraction (DAE) in itself is a fairly detailed topic.  For example, a number of encoders, extractors... exist in the repositories and a number of encoding file formats can be used that may be appropriate for a given situation.  Also, I think this will continue to be a topic of interest... hence, having its own namespace will be of benefit. --Gen2ly
 +
 +
:Well if you remove the script dump (it belongs in a gist, for example), little remains of the page. If you plan to expand on it, fine, but right now it might be just as well merged. -- [[User:Alad|Alad]] ([[User talk:Alad|talk]]) 21:35, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:35, 15 December 2014

Future direction of article

I'd like to preserve this article if possible. I believe this is a good reason because the article Optical_disc_drive is big. This discussion may even start a sub-discussion of the purview of that article, but for me, I'm going to keep the my comments to this article. I think this article is necessary because Digital Audio Extraction (DAE) in itself is a fairly detailed topic. For example, a number of encoders, extractors... exist in the repositories and a number of encoding file formats can be used that may be appropriate for a given situation. Also, I think this will continue to be a topic of interest... hence, having its own namespace will be of benefit. --Gen2ly

Well if you remove the script dump (it belongs in a gist, for example), little remains of the page. If you plan to expand on it, fine, but right now it might be just as well merged. -- Alad (talk) 21:35, 15 December 2014 (UTC)