Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ruby Gem package guidelines"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "> For libraries, use ruby-gemname. For applications, use the program name. For me it makes more sense to use ruby-$gemname for *all* packages created from gems. It makes thin...")
 
(Comment on packaging guidelines.)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
[[User:Anatolik|Anatolik]] ([[User talk:Anatolik|talk]]) 06:52, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Anatolik
 
[[User:Anatolik|Anatolik]] ([[User talk:Anatolik|talk]]) 06:52, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Anatolik
 +
 +
: I agree. I already do this for several of my packages, such as {{AUR|ruby-adsf}}, {{AUR|ruby-reek}}, and {{AUR|ruby-nanoc}}.
 +
: [[User:Ichimonji10|Ichimonji10]] ([[User talk:Ichimonji10|talk]]) 20:49, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:49, 7 December 2013

> For libraries, use ruby-gemname. For applications, use the program name.

For me it makes more sense to use ruby-$gemname for *all* packages created from gems. It makes things simpler.

Anatolik (talk) 06:52, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Anatolik

I agree. I already do this for several of my packages, such as ruby-adsfAUR, ruby-reekAUR, and ruby-nanocAUR.
Ichimonji10 (talk) 20:49, 7 December 2013 (UTC)