Difference between revisions of "Talk:SysVinit"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Do we have to delete this page?: re)
m (Do we have to delete this page?: re)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
::Sure I am but that's irrelevant, I was told on IRC by Earnestly and MrElendig that I should do it. [[User:Kyrias|Kyrias]] ([[User talk:Kyrias|talk]]) 19:23, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 
::Sure I am but that's irrelevant, I was told on IRC by Earnestly and MrElendig that I should do it. [[User:Kyrias|Kyrias]] ([[User talk:Kyrias|talk]]) 19:23, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 
:::I see, I've just updated the article to better reflect the current status of SysVinit and warn uninformed users. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 08:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 
:::I see, I've just updated the article to better reflect the current status of SysVinit and warn uninformed users. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 08:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 +
::::I just revised your note to more strongly encourage adoption of systemd. -- [[User:Jstjohn|Jstjohn]] ([[User talk:Jstjohn|talk]]) 12:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:33, 13 June 2013

Do we have to delete this page?

sysvinitAUR is in the AUR so it still is relevant to Arch. OpenRC has its page too. -- Karol (talk) 11:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Nah, you're right, I've removed the template, the user who added it is just a bit unexperienced :) -- Kynikos (talk) 11:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Sure I am but that's irrelevant, I was told on IRC by Earnestly and MrElendig that I should do it. Kyrias (talk) 19:23, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
I see, I've just updated the article to better reflect the current status of SysVinit and warn uninformed users. -- Kynikos (talk) 08:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
I just revised your note to more strongly encourage adoption of systemd. -- Jstjohn (talk) 12:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC)