From ArchWiki
Revision as of 12:39, 13 June 2013 by Jstjohn (talk | contribs) (Do we have to delete this page?: revise my reply)
Jump to: navigation, search

Do we have to delete this page?

sysvinitAUR is in the AUR so it still is relevant to Arch. OpenRC has its page too. -- Karol (talk) 11:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Nah, you're right, I've removed the template, the user who added it is just a bit unexperienced :) -- Kynikos (talk) 11:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Sure I am but that's irrelevant, I was told on IRC by Earnestly and MrElendig that I should do it. Kyrias (talk) 19:23, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
I see, I've just updated the article to better reflect the current status of SysVinit and warn uninformed users. -- Kynikos (talk) 08:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
I just revised your note to more strongly encourage adoption of systemd. Also, note that systemd has ~95% adoption according to [1]. I'm not sure how "Popular unofficial packages" is determined, but it lists ~30% for initscripts/sysvinit. -- Jstjohn (talk) 12:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC)