Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sysctl"

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new section)
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
-- [[User:DoctorJellyface|DoctorJellyface]] ([[User talk:DoctorJellyface|talk]]) 08:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 
-- [[User:DoctorJellyface|DoctorJellyface]] ([[User talk:DoctorJellyface|talk]]) 08:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Yes, I agree. When I changed the section a little with [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Sysctl&type=revision&diff=435336&oldid=422169], I left the comment. The reason was that while it simplifies in current form, expanding it to show the difference between system memory and available memory first and only then calculate the percentages makes it cumbersome/complicated to follow. If you have an idea how to do it, please go ahead. --[[User:Indigo|Indigo]] ([[User talk:Indigo|talk]]) 09:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:08, 8 August 2016

net.ipv4.tcp_rfc1337

From kernel doc:

tcp_rfc1337 - BOOLEAN
	If set, the TCP stack behaves conforming to RFC1337. If unset,
	we are not conforming to RFC, but prevent TCP TIME_WAIT
	assassination.
	Default: 0

So, isn't 0 the safe value? Our wiki says otherwise. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 08:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

With setting 0 the system would 'assassinate' a socket in time_wait prematurely upon receiving a RST. While this might sound like a good idea (it frees up a socket quicker), it opens the door for tcp sequence problems/syn replay. Those problems were described in RFC1337 and enabling the setting 1 is one way to deal with them (letting TIME_WAIT packets idle out even if a reset is received, so that the sequence number cannot be reused meanwhile). The wiki is correct in my view. Kernel doc is wrong here - "prevent" should read "enable". --Indigo (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Virtual memory

The official documentation states that these two variables "Contain[s], as a percentage of total available memory that contains free pages and reclaimable pages,..." and that "The total available memory is not equal to total system memory.". However the comment underneath talks about them as if they were a percentage of system memory, making it quite confusing, e.g. I have 6GiB of system memory but only 1-2GiB available.

Also the defaults seem to have changed, I have dirty_ratio=50 and dirty_background_ratio=20.

-- DoctorJellyface (talk) 08:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I agree. When I changed the section a little with [1], I left the comment. The reason was that while it simplifies in current form, expanding it to show the difference between system memory and available memory first and only then calculate the percentages makes it cumbersome/complicated to follow. If you have an idea how to do it, please go ahead. --Indigo (talk) 09:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)