From ArchWiki
Revision as of 15:12, 25 October 2012 by 65kid (talk | contribs) (Hibernation with systemd)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Lack of internet connection using static ip address without netcfg or NetworkManager

See Systemd#A_pure_systemd_installation it instructs to remove the initscripts package. When doing so take care not to use the -s option of pacman with -R as it removes the iproute2 package also unless you have another package with iproute2 as a dependency.


pacman -R initscripts
pacman -Rn initscripts

Not safe when iproute2 will also be removed:

pacman -Rs initscripts   
pacman -Rns initscripts

-- imatechguy (talk) 00:28, 11 Oct 2012 (UTC)

  • It is fixed. iproute2 is in base group now. Close.
-- Fengchao (talk) 02:19, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Only the iproute2 build in [testing] is in the base group. It's been in [testing] for nearly a week, so hopefully it'll be released soon.
-- Jstjohn (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Display manager fails to load with fast SSD

I was having a problem with my display manager (LXDM) not loading on my laptop, which has a Sandisk Extreme SSD. Xorg.log would show errors like "No screens found."

I eventually figured out that the problem was that my computer was booting so fast that KMS didn't have enough time to kick in before X was started. I solved by adding the KMS driver (i915 in my case) to the initramfs.

Just a tip for SSD users, not sure if it should be added to the page or not.
--Steev (talk) 16:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

  • This is a general problem that needs to be solved in the display manager. GDM already implements the bits for the CanGraphical flag.
-- Falconindy (talk) 21:34, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Hibernation with systemd

The hibernation section should be considered a hack since systemd does not directly handle the backend that handles power management. Systemd uses the Upower interface to handle such requests
-- Yungtrizzle (talk) 06:25, 10 October 2012‎

  • I talked about hibernation process with Lennart Poettering and he said that systemd-hibernate does only "echo disk > /sys/power/state" . As far as i can see, it works perfectly with tuxonice, since it seems it is now using the same userspace API as kernel hibernation; so it works even without hibernate-script installed (i use it without that package).
-- Nierro (talk) 13:54, 24 October 2012
  • what is the #Hibernation section all about anyway? It makes it sound like you need to use uswsusp to hibernate while it should work out of the box just fine. It doesn't explain at all why you would want to use uswsusp instead of the default command. I don't use hibernate nor do I know what uswsusp actually does, so what am I missing here? 65kid (talk) 15:12, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Removing rc.local

It isn't clear how to get rid of rc.local. It would be useful to include this statement from the forum discussion in moving from a mixed system to a pure system:

Go through /etc/rc.local and /etc/rc.local.shutdown and turn them into service files (or, if you intend to keep them as they are, copy /usr/lib/systemd/system/rc-local{,.shutdown}.service to /etc/systemd/system/).
--‎ Myshkin (talk) 00:21, 13 Oct 2012

Replacing ConsoleKit with systemd-logind -> networkmanager

As of networkmanager in [extra] we do no more have to recompile it with systemd support from ABS, is this right? So the note should be upgraded. Am i missing anything?
-- Nierro (talk) 09:31, 15 October 2012

65kid (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Damn, you're right. I did not see that pkgrel=3 while we are still using -2. Sorry, it means i'm still using my recompiled package, while i thought i was using the [extra] one.
-- Nierro (talk) 16:35, 15 October 2012

Removing systemd-sysvcompat?

So I was thinking: lets go all the way and remove systemd-sysvcompat. After some scary moments I found out init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd has to be enabled since otherwise there is nothing to boot into. I also noticed this removes the reboot and poweroff commands ( systemctl {reboot,shutdown} replace these).

Now, is this the recommended way to go in the future, or should everyone keep systemd-sysvcompat installed?
-- Lonaowna (talk) 23:56, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Based on the files systemd-sysvcompat provides (click "View the file list for systemd-sysvcompat"), I think most people will want to keep this package installed indefinitely.
-- Jstjohn (talk) 21:39, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm considering this closed.
-- Jstjohn (talk) 15:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)