Difference between revisions of "Talk:Systemd"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Hibernation with systemd: rm closed discussion)
(GNOME 3.6 issues inhibited commands: rm closed discussion)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
:This is a general problem that needs to be solved in the display manager. GDM already implements the bits for the [http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=f1a8e221ecacea23 CanGraphical] flag.
 
:This is a general problem that needs to be solved in the display manager. GDM already implements the bits for the [http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=f1a8e221ecacea23 CanGraphical] flag.
 
:-- [[User:Falconindy|Falconindy]] ([[User talk:Falconindy|talk]]) 21:34, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 
:-- [[User:Falconindy|Falconindy]] ([[User talk:Falconindy|talk]]) 21:34, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 
== <s> GNOME 3.6 issues inhibited commands </s> ==
 
It seems that GNOME 3.6 now issues the necessary "inhibited" commands, at my system now doesn't suspend twice with the standard configuration anymore. However I'm not familiar enough with the whole concept to be absolutely sure, so I won't update the page itself. Maybe someone with more competence regarding the inhibited commands can confirm this and edit the page?<br>
 
-- [[User:Johnpatcher|Johnpatcher]] ([[User_talk:Johnpatcher|talk]]) 00:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 
: Inhibited note is added. Close. -- [[User:Fengchao|Fengchao]] ([[User talk:Fengchao|talk]]) 01:42, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 
  
 
== Should we add a note about CUPS under 'Transitioning from initscripts to systemd'? ==
 
== Should we add a note about CUPS under 'Transitioning from initscripts to systemd'? ==

Revision as of 21:42, 18 November 2012

Should the section "writing a custom .service" be expanded?

I think so.. as long as I got, this is necessary to run self-made scripts during the boot process, but this is not clear and the structure of the files is not well presented.

Moreover, when explain how to transit from the initscript, some referrals on how to move the old custom hooks in /etc/rc.d/functions.d to be executed by systemd, should be made.

--DarioP (talk) 12:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Display manager fails to load with fast SSD

I was having a problem with my display manager (LXDM) not loading on my laptop, which has a Sandisk Extreme SSD. Xorg.log would show errors like "No screens found."

I eventually figured out that the problem was that my computer was booting so fast that KMS didn't have enough time to kick in before X was started. I solved by adding the KMS driver (i915 in my case) to the initramfs.

Just a tip for SSD users, not sure if it should be added to the page or not.
--Steev (talk) 16:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

This is a general problem that needs to be solved in the display manager. GDM already implements the bits for the CanGraphical flag.
-- Falconindy (talk) 21:34, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Should we add a note about CUPS under 'Transitioning from initscripts to systemd'?

Are there any more sockets that change?

Copied from the CUPS wiki:

...

Systemd uses a different CUPS socket file located at:

/usr/lib/systemd/system/cups.socket

The default CUPS socket file is located at:

/var/run/cups/cups.sock

Edit /etc/cups/cupsd.conf and /etc/cups/client.conf as root to use the systemd socket instead of the default. Make sure to restart CUPS when you are done:

# systemctl restart cups

...
-- JKAbrams 5 November 2012

This sounds more like a cups packaging bug that should just be fixed.
-- Jstjohn (talk) 01:11, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
It sounds like someone who doesn't have a clue about systemd. That cups.socket file is a systemd unit file of type socket, which contains the location of the socket file for CUPS (and that is still /var/run/cups/cups.sock).
Raynman (talk) 22:49, 9 November 2012 (UTC)