Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arch Linux"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Created page with 'The part that says "Arch Linux defines simplicity as a lightweight base structure without unnecessary additions, modifications, or complications..." basically contradicts itself.…')
 
(Can someone please rename the Romanian link?: rm closed discussion)
(19 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The part that says "Arch Linux defines simplicity as a lightweight base structure without unnecessary additions, modifications, or complications..." basically contradicts itself. It has a lot of clutter that might use a revert to the original version Dusty and I wrote. See for yourself. Are "additions" and "modifications" unnecessary? No. They are just not considered base structure. But they are certainly needed if you want to do something useful. Any attempt to further explain the "lightweight base structure" is just adding clutter. The same can be said of many parts in the article. I haven't checked back on it for a long time, but it seems people have just added a lot of stuff without cleaning it up. --[[User:Foxbunny|foxbunny]] 18:33, 14 May 2010 (EDT)
+
 

Revision as of 17:38, 28 November 2012