Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unofficial user repositories"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(add heading)
(Outdated and confusing intro)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
[[User:Karol|Karol]] 11:34, 16 January 2011 (EST)
 
[[User:Karol|Karol]] 11:34, 16 January 2011 (EST)
 +
 +
== Outdated and confusing intro ==
 +
Do we need [[Unofficial_User_Repositories#The_future_of_Unofficial_repos]]? Not everyone has to be interested in the history and who's who of Arch. If this idea is still worth keeping, can we move it to the talk page?
 +
 +
I also don't like the next heading (but just the heading, not the contents): [[Unofficial_User_Repositories#List_of_PUR_.28unofficial_user_repositories.29]]. What is PUR? Personal Users' Repositories? Can we decide on a single name - is it personal or unofficial? -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] ([[User talk:Karol|talk]]) 21:04, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:04, 26 September 2012

Why don't repos provide files.tar.gz database?

Is there a reason many (most?) user repos don't provide files.tar.gz? http://projects.archlinux.org/dbscripts.git/tree/cron-jobs/create-filelists

Without it tools like pkgfile won't work.

Karol 11:34, 16 January 2011 (EST)

Outdated and confusing intro

Do we need Unofficial_User_Repositories#The_future_of_Unofficial_repos? Not everyone has to be interested in the history and who's who of Arch. If this idea is still worth keeping, can we move it to the talk page?

I also don't like the next heading (but just the heading, not the contents): Unofficial_User_Repositories#List_of_PUR_.28unofficial_user_repositories.29. What is PUR? Personal Users' Repositories? Can we decide on a single name - is it personal or unofficial? -- Karol (talk) 21:04, 26 September 2012 (UTC)