Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unofficial user repositories"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Why don't repos provide files.tar.gz database?: re)
(Outdated and confusing intro: fixed)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
== Outdated and confusing intro ==
 
== Outdated and confusing intro ==
Do we need [[Unofficial_User_Repositories#The_future_of_Unofficial_repos]]? Not everyone has to be interested in the history and who's who of Arch. If this idea is still worth keeping, can we move it to the talk page?
+
Do we need [[Unofficial_User_Repositories#The_future_of_Unofficial_repos]]? Not everyone has to be interested in the history and who's who of Arch. If this idea is still worth keeping, can we move it to the talk page? -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] ([[User talk:Karol|talk]]) 21:04, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
  
 +
==<s>PUR or UUR?</s>==
 
I also don't like the next heading (but just the heading, not the contents): [[Unofficial_User_Repositories#List_of_PUR_.28unofficial_user_repositories.29]]. What is PUR? Personal Users' Repositories? Can we decide on a single name - is it personal or unofficial? -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] ([[User talk:Karol|talk]]) 21:04, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 
I also don't like the next heading (but just the heading, not the contents): [[Unofficial_User_Repositories#List_of_PUR_.28unofficial_user_repositories.29]]. What is PUR? Personal Users' Repositories? Can we decide on a single name - is it personal or unofficial? -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] ([[User talk:Karol|talk]]) 21:04, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 +
:[https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Unofficial_User_Repositories&diff=225619&oldid=225617 Fixed], closed. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 12:01, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:01, 27 September 2012

Why don't repos provide files.tar.gz database?

Is there a reason many (most?) user repos don't provide files.tar.gz? http://projects.archlinux.org/dbscripts.git/tree/cron-jobs/create-filelists

Without it tools like pkgfile won't work.

Karol 11:34, 16 January 2011 (EST)

Maybe it's time to ask this question on the forum (I hope it's not yet a crime to instigate Karol to post something on the forum :D ). -- Kynikos (talk) 11:57, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Outdated and confusing intro

Do we need Unofficial_User_Repositories#The_future_of_Unofficial_repos? Not everyone has to be interested in the history and who's who of Arch. If this idea is still worth keeping, can we move it to the talk page? -- Karol (talk) 21:04, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

PUR or UUR?

I also don't like the next heading (but just the heading, not the contents): Unofficial_User_Repositories#List_of_PUR_.28unofficial_user_repositories.29. What is PUR? Personal Users' Repositories? Can we decide on a single name - is it personal or unofficial? -- Karol (talk) 21:04, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Fixed, closed. -- Kynikos (talk) 12:01, 27 September 2012 (UTC)