Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unofficial user repositories"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Repos that provide only foo.db.tar.gz databases: new section)
(use https for links to archlinux.org)
(17 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Is there a reason many (most?) user repos don't provide files.tar.gz? http://projects.archlinux.org/dbscripts.git/tree/cron-jobs/create-filelists
+
==The future of Unofficial repos==
 +
I'd like to see more work of this type.  Sometimes there are certain projects that don't mesh well with other things, such as the community repo.  The 'kdemod' project is a good example. If you want to contribute with your own builds, you can check page [[Custom local repository]].
 +
 
 +
In the future, well-thought-out user repositories may be ideal for lots of supplementary things.  Forming a "web of trust" is important in cases like this, so we may begin keeping a list of "recommended" repositories somewhere, in order to make it seem more official and trustworthy.
 +
 
 +
[[User:Phrakture|Phrakture]] 12:50, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Why don't repos provide files.tar.gz database? ==
 +
Is there a reason many (most?) user repos don't provide files.tar.gz? https://projects.archlinux.org/dbscripts.git/tree/cron-jobs/create-filelists
  
 
Without it tools like pkgfile won't work.
 
Without it tools like pkgfile won't work.
Line 5: Line 13:
 
[[User:Karol|Karol]] 11:34, 16 January 2011 (EST)
 
[[User:Karol|Karol]] 11:34, 16 January 2011 (EST)
  
== Repos that provide only foo.db.tar.gz databases ==
+
:Maybe it's time to ask this question on the forum (I hope it's not yet a crime to instigate Karol to post something on the forum :D ). -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 11:57, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 
+
::I did some checking by hand and found that many repos do provide them now, but some still don't. [https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1177795#p1177795 I opened a thread] on the forums asking if more maintainers would consider adding this feature to their repos. -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] ([[User talk:Karol|talk]]) 13:56, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
They are incompatible with [http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS?id=v3.5.0 pacman 3.5]. What do we do with them? -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 19:47, 2 May 2011 (EDT)
+

Revision as of 07:13, 28 April 2013

The future of Unofficial repos

I'd like to see more work of this type. Sometimes there are certain projects that don't mesh well with other things, such as the community repo. The 'kdemod' project is a good example. If you want to contribute with your own builds, you can check page Custom local repository.

In the future, well-thought-out user repositories may be ideal for lots of supplementary things. Forming a "web of trust" is important in cases like this, so we may begin keeping a list of "recommended" repositories somewhere, in order to make it seem more official and trustworthy.

Phrakture 12:50, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

Why don't repos provide files.tar.gz database?

Is there a reason many (most?) user repos don't provide files.tar.gz? https://projects.archlinux.org/dbscripts.git/tree/cron-jobs/create-filelists

Without it tools like pkgfile won't work.

Karol 11:34, 16 January 2011 (EST)

Maybe it's time to ask this question on the forum (I hope it's not yet a crime to instigate Karol to post something on the forum :D ). -- Kynikos (talk) 11:57, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
I did some checking by hand and found that many repos do provide them now, but some still don't. I opened a thread on the forums asking if more maintainers would consider adding this feature to their repos. -- Karol (talk) 13:56, 18 October 2012 (UTC)