Talk:Unofficial user repositories
The future of Unofficial repos
I'd like to see more work of this type. Sometimes there are certain projects that don't mesh well with other things, such as the community repo. The 'kdemod' project is a good example. If you want to contribute with your own builds, you can check page Custom local repository.
In the future, well-thought-out user repositories may be ideal for lots of supplementary things. Forming a "web of trust" is important in cases like this, so we may begin keeping a list of "recommended" repositories somewhere, in order to make it seem more official and trustworthy.
Phrakture 12:50, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
Why don't repos provide files.tar.gz database?
Is there a reason many (most?) user repos don't provide files.tar.gz? https://projects.archlinux.org/dbscripts.git/tree/cron-jobs/create-filelists
Without it tools like pkgfile won't work.
Karol 11:34, 16 January 2011 (EST)
- Maybe it's time to ask this question on the forum (I hope it's not yet a crime to instigate Karol to post something on the forum :D ). -- Kynikos (talk) 11:57, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Include maintainer info?
I think it is a sensible requirement to include some info about the maintainer of each repository - at least a (nick)name + contact (website, email, userpage on ArchWiki or the forums...). Any thoughts? -- Lahwaacz (talk) 18:08, 22 November 2013 (UTC)