Difference between revisions of "Talk:VCS package guidelines"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (git & darcs)
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
The title for this article indicate guidelines for CVS and SVN, but git and darcs are also included. Perhaps the title should be changed to reflect this, or git and darcs guidelines should be separated off into their own articles. --[[User:Mentallaxative|mentallaxative]] 01:48, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
 
The title for this article indicate guidelines for CVS and SVN, but git and darcs are also included. Perhaps the title should be changed to reflect this, or git and darcs guidelines should be separated off into their own articles. --[[User:Mentallaxative|mentallaxative]] 01:48, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
What's the reason for using 'cp -r $_svnmod $_svnmod-build' instead of using 'svn export $_svnmod $_svnmod-build'?--[[User:BertiBoeller|BertiBoeller]] 19:21, 15 March 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:21, 15 March 2009

Q: Any reason for using 'svn co' instead of 'svn export'? export is way faster for these situations and it doesn't create all the .svn files.

A: Look at http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=245213




Just wondering if the versionpkg part will be removed - I hear that makepkg now has versionpkgs functionality... --ak5 16:55, 8 June 2008 (EDT)

-- done (wide-eye)



The title for this article indicate guidelines for CVS and SVN, but git and darcs are also included. Perhaps the title should be changed to reflect this, or git and darcs guidelines should be separated off into their own articles. --mentallaxative 01:48, 18 October 2008 (EDT)


What's the reason for using 'cp -r $_svnmod $_svnmod-build' instead of using 'svn export $_svnmod $_svnmod-build'?--BertiBoeller 19:21, 15 March 2009 (EDT)